Bipartisan Backlash Stops Dismantling of Oregon Coast Scientific Monitoring Instruments

The Trump administration’s latest attempt to cut funding to a climate-related program – dismantling 900 scientific weather monitoring instruments off the Pacific Northwest coastline in Oregon and elsewhere – has backfired after a successful bipartisan backlash led by Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley.

 

Lawmakers Put an End to the National Science Foundation’s “Descoping” Plans

The lawmakers were able to stop the National Science Foundation (NSF) from dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) system of buoys and other instruments.

Tidings Data Snapshot
Ocean Observatories Initiative Footprint
5
Ocean arrays
80
Platforms
900
Instruments collecting ocean data
924 km
Pacific Coast cable
200+
Billion rows of data generated

Source: Ocean Observatories Initiative By the Numbers
Dailytidings.com

The operation was scheduled to begin off the Oregon coastline on June 16.

Their ‘Save Our Sensors’ bill, passed unanimously, prohibits the NSF from using federal funding to dismantle the OOI project.

Tidings Data Snapshot
OOI Funding Fight At A Glance
Bill name Saving the OOI Act
Senate action Passed unanimously
Federal restriction No decommissioning funds before review
NSF update No further removal or descoping
Next step Stakeholder input and expert panel

Sources: Senator Jeff Merkley and National Science Foundation
Dailytidings.com

Merkley says in a statement that he will continue to fight to ensure that scientists, fishermen, and coastal communities can continue to utilize the important data provided by the scientific community.

 

Seven Oregon Coastline Bipartisan Lawmakers Supported the ‘Save Our Sensors’ Bill

The lawmakers were supported by seven bipartisan politicians representing districts along the Oregon coastline. They criticized the federal government’s decision in a letter addressed to the NSF acting director, Brian Stone.

Throwing their weight behind Senator Merkley were signatories Dick Anderson (Lincoln City), Court Boice (Gold Beach), David Brock-Smith (Port Orford), Suzanne Weber (Tillamook), Boomer Wright (Coos Bay), and the only two Democrats, David Gomberg (Otis), and Cyrus Javadi (Tillamook).

In their letter, the politicians point out that the OOI is an indispensable initiative protecting the safety of coastal communities. They say it is also important to the local economy, providing jobs, and maintaining community preparedness.

 

The Dismantling Project Would Have Impacted Tracking Extreme Weather Events Like El Niño

Dismantling the $386 million system off the coastlines of Oregon, Washington, Alaska, North Carolina, Massachusetts, and Greenland would have ended the scientific tracking of changing ocean conditions and extreme weather events, like El Niño.

The NSF stated that ‘descoping’ the scientific OOI project would save the federal government $30 million.

However, the turnaround achieved by lawmakers means that the OOI project will continue its oceanic monitoring services for another 15 to 20 years.

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution coordinates the OOI, together with Oregon State University and the University of Washington, at an annual cost of $48 million.

Morning Brief Newsletter
Sign up today for our daily newsletter, a quick overview of top local stories and Oregon breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time. We do not share your information with third parties, and we will only send our daily newsletter.
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.