|
|
DailyTidings.com
  • How much pot is too much to drive safely?

  • SEATTLE — Under a clear blue Southern California sky, four editors of Car and Driver magazine stepped on a closed driving course and got, as they later wrote, "stoned back to the bomb age."
    • email print
      Comment
  • SEATTLE — Under a clear blue Southern California sky, four editors of Car and Driver magazine stepped on a closed driving course and got, as they later wrote, "stoned back to the bomb age."
    It was all for a good purpose. There was little convincing science showing how — or how much — marijuana impaired driving ability. So they did a field test.
    The editors found that they could physically operate a car even while very high, and fared well on driving tests. But their attention spans got so fragmented that they agreed getting behind the wheel was a lousy idea.
    That was 1980. Thirty-two years later, scientific consensus about marijuana's effect on driving remains as foggy as the editors' brains.
    But it is now a big political issue as voters consider whether to make Washington one of the first states to legalize recreational marijuana sales. Initiative 502 would set a legal impairment level for THC, the psychoactive compound in marijuana.
    Based on some studies, that level — 5 nanograms of active THC per milliliter of whole blood — may be equivalent to about 0.05 milligrams of alcohol per milliliter of blood, less than the state limit for booze. But even the experts emphasize that establishing the cutoff point when crash risk rises is "preliminary" and could change, in part because marijuana research in the U.S. is hindered by the federal ban on the substance.
    The proposal is complicated, legally and politically.
    Initiative 502 sets a "per se" standard making it inherently illegal to drive with more than 5 nanograms of THC. But there are no handy charts showing the number of tokes it takes to reach that level, because marijuana varies in strength and affects novice and seasoned users differently. I-502 supporters describe the DUI provision as a political and law enforcement necessity. "This is simple: Don't drive when you think you might be impaired," said Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes, an I-502 sponsor.
    But uncertainties about the DUI provision fuel strong opposition among some marijuana-legalization advocates. They predict a rash of DUI cases based on unsettled science, and object to a zero-tolerance level for drivers younger than 21, which also is prescribed in the new law.
    That provision helped turn prominent DUI lawyer Jon Scott Fox of Seattle from a likely supporter into an opponent. "I think innocent people could be, and probably will be, prosecuted based on the per se aspect of the law," he said.
    About 10.5 million people — 4.2 percent of the country's drivers — reported in a 2009 federal survey that they drove under the influence of an illegal drug in the past year, with marijuana by far the most common drug. Among high-school seniors, 1 in 10 said they'd recently driven under the influence of marijuana, according to a University of Michigan survey.
    Currently, there are plenty of DUI prosecutions for marijuana, and I-502 does not change legal standards for stopping or arresting drivers.
    If something other than alcohol is suspected during a traffic stop, one of 217 "Drug Recognition Experts" — specially trained police officers throughout the state — usually are called in to do a 40-minute evaluation, said Washington State Patrol Sgt. Mark Crandall, who coordinates the program.
    Based on that evaluation, the driver would be asked for a blood draw at a medical facility; a search warrant also can be obtained, and drivers with four previous DUIs must give blood. About a third of the blood tests in the past three years — 1,536 out of 4,581 — found marijuana, according to Washington State Patrol data.
    Because there is no current cutoff for THC, even a positive blood test for any amount, alone, is not grounds for a DUI conviction. One Seattle driver was recently acquitted for DUI despite a positive blood test because of questions about the science.
    Francisco Duarte, a defense lawyer specializing in DUI cases, said that makes prosecutors prone to plea bargain marijuana DUI cases.
    But I-502 would make DUI prosecutors' jobs easier. A driver with a blood test above 5 nanograms would be presumed impaired, just as drivers with 0.08 percent blood alcohol levels are now.
    "This definitely takes away a defendant's ability to argue what impairment really means," said Duarte.
    The 5-nanogram level is based on tests for active THC, which usually dissipates within hours of use. Another pot compound, carboxy-THC — stored in fat cells for 30 days or more, often tripping up users in workplace drug tests — is not counted under I-502 as a basis for impairment.
Reader Reaction

      calendar